據(jù)安迅思3月16日消息稱，據(jù)路透社報道，雪佛龍概述了到2025年擴(kuò)大石油和天然氣生產(chǎn)的計(jì)劃，但不會大幅增加支出，并承諾限制其碳排放的增長速度。

2020年，由于大規(guī)模封鎖導(dǎo)致的能源需求下降導(dǎo)致行業(yè)陷入混亂，導(dǎo)致雪佛龍公司自2016年以來首次出現(xiàn)55.4億美元的年度虧損。

投資者一直在向雪佛龍和其他石油公司施壓，要求它們保持支出不變，減少導(dǎo)致氣候變化的排放。

雪佛龍首席執(zhí)行官M(fèi)ichael Wirth在周二的報告中對分析師表示，無論油價如何波動，雪佛龍都可以實(shí)現(xiàn)其產(chǎn)量和碳排放目標(biāo)。

“我們不會押注更高的價格來拯救我們，” 他說，這顯然是在挖苦埃克森和其它指望油價反彈來彌補(bǔ)派息和償還債務(wù)的公司。到2025年，雪佛龍的資本回報率(衡量公司投資效率的指標(biāo))可以翻一番以上，達(dá)到10%以上。

盡管如此，一些分析人士對氣候和排放目標(biāo)并不滿意，認(rèn)為它們過于溫和。股價從一年高點(diǎn)小幅下跌至109.50美元。

加拿大皇家銀行資本市場分析師Biraj Borkhataria表示，預(yù)計(jì)到2025年，扣除股息和項(xiàng)目支出后的自由現(xiàn)金流將達(dá)到250億美元，這“令人失望”。

他補(bǔ)充說，碳強(qiáng)度目標(biāo)“落后于行業(yè)平均水平”，“專注于其可控元素”，而不是建立新的業(yè)務(wù)線”，這可能有助于利潤。

朱佳妮 摘譯自 安迅思

原文如下：

Chevron to slow carbon emissions, raise oil and gas output through 2025

Chevron outlined a plan to expand oil and gas production through 2025, but without spending significantly more, and pledged to limit the pace of growth of its carbon emissions, reported Reuters.

Falling energy demand due to pandemic-driven lockdowns sent the industry into a tailspin in 2020 and led Chevron to a USD5.54 billion annual loss, its first since 2016.

Investors have been pressuring Chevron and other oil companies to hold spending flat and reduce emissions that contribute to climate change.

Chief Executive Officer Michael Wirth told analysts in a presentation on Tuesday that Chevron can achieve its output and carbon goals regardless of oil price fluctuations.

"We're not betting on higher prices to bail us out," he said in an apparent dig at Exxon and others counting on oil's rebound to cover dividends and debt repayments. By 2025, Chevron can more than double its return on capital employed, a measure of how efficiently a company invests, to more than 10%.

Still, some analysts were unimpressed with the climate and emissions goals, viewing them as too modest. Shares dipped a fraction from a one-year high to USD109.50.

A forecast of USD25 billion in free cash flow through 2025 after dividends and project outlays is "underwhelming," said Biraj Borkhataria, an analyst with RBC Capital Markets.

The carbon intensity goals "lag the industry average" and "focus on its controllable elements" rather than building new business lines," that could contribute to profits, he added.